Management based on entrepreneurism for Mypes that allows its entrepreneurial development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26490/st.v1i1.720Keywords:
Business Management, Development and MicroenterprisesAbstract
This research entitled Entrepreneurial management based on entrepreneurship for mypes that allows business development, had as a general objective to explain how business management based on entrepreneurship for Mypes allows their business development, in order to propose an improvement proposal for the management variable business that affects the results of the development of the company; The general hypothesis was that entrepreneurial management based on entrepreneurship for Mypes allows for business development, having a convenience sample of 17 microenterprises, for which two data collection instruments were developed, where the first questionnaire for the variable independent, business management, consisting of 60 items, and the second questionnaire for the dependent variable, business development, consisting of 5 items, it should be noted that such questionnaires were formulated taking into account the dimensions of each variable analyzed; where the data collected were subsequently sorted by a tripartite matrix. To test the hypothesis, the chi square independence test was used to validate the general hypothesis and the specific hypothesis, since the present thesis is of explanatory research level, its variables are nominal and the sample was of 17 microenterprises reaching the conclusion that entrepreneurial management based on entrepreneurship for Mypes allows their business development (chi square = 16.661; Sig = 0.000).
Downloads
References
ACS, Z. (2008). Foundations of high impact entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(6), 535-620.
Acs, Z. J., Amorós, J. E., Bosma, N. S. & Levie, J. (2009). From entrepreneurship to economic development: Celebrating ten years of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(16), Article 1.
Arenius, P. & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233-247.
Autio, E. (2007). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2007 Global Report on High-Growth Entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA, US: Babson College and London, UK: London Business School. Recuperado de http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/ download/269
Autio, E., Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., Parker, G. & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145-160.
Bernal Torres, C. A. (2010). Metodologia de la investigacion. Para administracion, economia, humanidades y ciencias sociales (3ra. ed.). Colombia: Pearson Educacion.
Bosma, N. & Schutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(3), 711-742.
Bosma, N., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Coduras, A. & Levie, J. (2009). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2008
Bosma, N., Wennekers, S. & Amorós, E. (2012). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 extended report: Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial employees across the globe. Babson Park, MA: Babson College; Santiago, Chile: Universidad del DesarroDesarrollo; Reykjavík, Iceland: Háskólinn Reykjavík University; London, UK: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
Brandes, E. (2010). Perú: política de negociaciones comerciales internacionales. Recuperado de <http://www.urp.edu.pe/epang/portal/imagenes /ppt2.pdf>.
Caballero Romero, A. E. (2014). Metodología integral innovadora para planes y tesis. La metodología del cómo formularlos (1ra ed.). Mexico: Cengage Learning.
Camisón, C. (2000). Reflexiones sobre la investigación científica de la pyme. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 6(2), 13-29.
Centro Nacional de Planeamiento Estratégico Ceplan (2011). Plan Bicentenario. El Perú hacia el 2021, [en línea]. Lima, Perú: Ceplan. Recuperado de <http://www.ceplan.gob.pe/documents/10157/d25c8335-f5874171-96ea-26e650bb772>.
Colombo, M. y Delmastro, M. (2001). Technology Based Entrepreneurs: Does Internet Make a Difference? Small Business Economics, 16 (3): 177 190.
Cowling, M. & Taylor, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial Women and Men: Two Different Species? Small Business Economics, 16 (3): 167 175.
Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. Nueva York: Springer.
Etzkowitz, H., Andrew W., Christiane G. & Cantisano, B. (2000). The Future of the University and the
University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2): 313– 330
Executive report. London, UK: London Business School; Santiago, Chile: Universidad del Desarrollo y Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6ta. ed.). México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Sierra, B. R. (2001). Técnicas de investigación Social: Teoría y Ejercicios. Madrid: Paraninfo.
Valera Loza, D. (2006). La enseñanza y promoción del comportamiento emprendedor en la Universidad.
Estado de las investigaciones empíricas 1975 2005. Tesina presentada en la Universidad de Sevilla. Programa de Doctorado en Administración de Empresas. Junio de 2006. Sevilla.
Vara Horna, A. A. (2007). Perfil emprendedor de los estudiantes de la Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Recursos Humanos. Lima: Universidad de San Martin de Porres.
Viloria Escobar, J., Daza Corrredor, A., & Miranda, T. L. (2016). Perfil emprendedor de los graduados de Administración de Empresas de la Universidad del Magdalena, 2010-2014. Contexto, 161-169.
