Saturation and sedimentation evaluation in the selective precipitation acid mine drainage

Authors

  • Salvador Oré Vidalón Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.prospectivauniversitaria.2012.9.37

Keywords:

Saturation, Sedimentation, Selective precipitation, Acid drainage

Abstract

In the present investigation, we carried out the evaluation of the saturation and sedimentation in the selective precipitation of acid mine drainage. Heavy metals were copper, zinc, manganese, iron and aluminum, the precipitation was performed by ad. calcium dioxide, establishing an appropriate range of pH based on the diagram of precipitation. The evaluation was performed with discontinuosm batch tests consisteing in order to establish the necessary parameters for sizing a continuous clarifier. The selective precipitation of the heavy metals present in the acid mine drainage is possible within the following ranges: at pH 4.15 the highest recovery is for iron with a value of 99.6% and 98.2 as established composition . At pH 5.9 a greater copper recovery is achieved with a composition of 88.5 and 73.6. At pH 8 the highest recovery is for zinc at of 94.6% and a composition of 81.4%. At pH 10 the higheest
recovery corresponds to 64.5 % manganese and a composition of 95.6%. Through this discontinuous sedimentation study it is possible determining the necessary design parameters for a continuous sedimentator in the selective precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AkcilS.A. y KoldasS. S. 2006. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1139-1145.

Burger R.I. yDamascenoJ. G. 2004 A mathematicalmodel for batch and continuous thickening of flocculated suspensions in vessels with varying cross-section. Int. J. Miner. Process. 73 (2004) 183– 208

Crawford E. 2010. The effects of pH regulation upon the release of sulphate from ferric precipitates formed in acid mine drainage. Applied Geochemistry 15, 27-34

Diehl, S. 2005. Operating charts for continuous sedimentation II: step responses. Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University

España J. S. 2007. The Behavior of Iron and Aluminum in Acid Mine Drainage: Speciation, Mineralogy, and Environmental Significance.Thermodynamic, Solubility and Environmental Issues, Editor Letcher T. V., Elsevier Science & Technology Books.

Kuyucak N., et. al. 2003.Technical feasibility studies and uses of treated AMD at Kingsmill Tunnel, Peru-Emphasis on supplement for drinking water supply. Mining and the Environment III Conference

Plasari E. y Muhr H. 2007 Developments in precipitation engineering for the process intensification in the environmental protection and other purification industrial activities. Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 11, 65-70.

TsukomotoR. T. 2012. Treatment of mine drainage with the rotating cylinder treatment system. Ionic Water Technologies.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-08

Issue

Section

Area III - Architecture and Engineering

How to Cite

Saturation and sedimentation evaluation in the selective precipitation acid mine drainage. (2022). University Prospective in Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.prospectivauniversitaria.2012.9.37