Analysis of the discussion section of the scientific articles of the faculty researchers UNCP, 2008-2012

Authors

  • Hugo Miguel Miguel Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú
  • Jesús Hurtado Rivera Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.prospectivauniversitaria.2014.11.3

Keywords:

Journal article, discussion, research

Abstract

The discussion of scientific articles written by researchers of the UNCP teachers, between 2008 to 2012 was analyzed. The study popu-lation consisted of all scientific papers produ-ced annually by educational researchers. The sample consisted of 48 items, obtained pro-babilistically; for N = 2118; Zα2 = 1,962; for a 95% confidence; p = expected proportion (5% = 0.05); p q = 1- (1-.05 = 0.95); d = Accuracy (10%). In each school they were ran-domly selected 8 scientific papers. The survey data come from the database of the resear-chers of the Research Center of the UNCP. With the achieved findings we conclude that; the percentages of levels of data interpreta-tion are: 39.6% medium level; 52.1% low level; and 8.3% from zero level; percentages levels implications of the data are: 6.3% low level; and 93.8% of zero level; the percen-tages of levels of definition of the potential limitations of the study are: 6.3% of the me-dian level; 4.2% of the low level; and 89.6% of zero level; the percentages of the levels of concordance or discordance with previous publications include: 12.5% of medium level; 20.8% low level; and 66.7% of zero level; and the percentages of the levels of the practical applications of the results are: 6.3%% low le-vel; 93.8% of zero level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moyeta D. (2009). La sección discusión del artículo de investigación científica en Psicología. Universidad Católica de Córdova. Argentina.

Polit DF, Hungler BP. (2011). Investigación científica en ciencias de la salud. Sexta edición. México: Editorial Interamericana; 2000. Citado por: Eslava J, Alzate JP. Cómo elaborar la discusión de un artículo científico. Rev. Col. Or. Tra. Colombia. 25 (1): 14-7.

Villagrán A, Harris PR. (2009). Algunas claves para escribir correctamente un artículo científico. Rev Chil Pediatr; 80 (1): 70 -78.

Day R. (2005). Cómo escribir y publicar trabajos científicos. Tercera edición en español. OPS. Washington.

Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. (1999). Metodología de la investigación. Segunda Edición. Mc GRAW - HILL. México.

Cazau P. (2006). Introducción a la investigación en ciencias sociales. Tercera Edición. Buenos Aires.

Rojas M. (2002). Manual de investigación y redacción científica. Book xpress. San Isidro. Lima, Perú.

De Miguel M. (2010). La evaluación de tesis doctorales. Propuesta de un modelo. Relieve, Vol. 16, N° 1, pp. 1-18.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-08

Issue

Section

Area II - Agricultural Science

How to Cite

Analysis of the discussion section of the scientific articles of the faculty researchers UNCP, 2008-2012. (2020). University Prospective in Engineering and Technology, 11(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.prospectivauniversitaria.2014.11.3