Playing to train our executive functions toward the development of autonomous learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.alboradaciencia.2025.5.2631Keywords:
executive functions, neuroeducation, educational games, autonomous learning, self-regulation, CEBAAbstract
This research project, entitled “Playing to Train Our Executive Functions to Develop Our Autonomous Learning,” was implemented at the Alternative Basic Education Center in the province of Tarma. It arose in response to needs identified in the diagnostic assessment of students in the advanced cycle, who exhibited difficulties with sustained attention, motivation, planning, and self-regulation of learning, associated with diverse socio-labor and educational circumstances. The proposal is based on neuroeducation and the competency-based approach of the Peruvian National Curriculum, prioritizing the development of competency 29, which focuses on the autonomous management of learning. The methodological approach combines training of executive functions, working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and attention through the implementation of structured, playful activities designed to activate cognitive and emotional processes that foster deep and sustainable learning. The research was conducted using a mixed descriptive-interpretive design, triangulating data from rubrics, checklists, portfolios, photographic records, brief interviews, and analysis of the results of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in self-regulation, time management, active participation, decision-making, and performance in curricular areas such as Mathematics, Communication, Social Sciences, and Vocational Education. Furthermore, it is confirmed that play, as a neuroeducational strategy, is an effective means of promoting intrinsic motivation, strengthening brain plasticity, and enhancing autonomy in young people and adults. The results underscore the relevance and scalability of this approach in adult basic education (ABE) contexts and its contribution to the student's holistic development.
References
AERA. (2011). Code of ethics. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403
Arbeláez, L., & Bernal, J. (2020). Estrategias lúdicas para el fortalecimiento de funciones ejecutivas en adultos jóvenes. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 79, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num79-10034
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. Guilford Press.
Best, J. R. (2010). Effects of physical activity on children's executive function: Contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Developmental Review, 30(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001
Blair, C. (2016). Stress and the development of self-regulation in context. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12191
Blair, C., & Razza, R. (2007). Relación entre funciones ejecutivas y rendimiento escolar. Child Development, 78(2), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2007.01019.x
Blair, C., & Ursache, A. (2015). A bidirectional model of executive functions and school readiness. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12067
Cabrera, F., & Vizcarra, L. (2021). Neuroeducación y funciones ejecutivas en estudiantes de educación básica en Lima Metropolitana. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2021.02.006
Carretero-Dios, H. (2019). Funciones ejecutivas en jóvenes y adultos: Implicancias educativas. Psicología Educativa, 25(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2019a6
Center on the Developing Child. (2020). Building core capabilities for life. Harvard University. https://developingchild.harvard.edu
Chein, J., & Morrison, A. (2010). Expanding the mind’s workspace: Training and transfer effects in working memory abilities. Memory & Cognition, 38, 351– 367. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.351
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Cozolino, L. (2013). The social neuroscience of education: Optimizing attachment and learning in the classroom. Norton.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135– 168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462
Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. Norton.
Jensen, E. (2016). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Jiménez, M. (2021). Aprendizaje lúdico y motivación en jóvenes y adultos en educación alternativa. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 86(2), 115– 135. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8624490
Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing.
López, G., & Arévalo, M. (2020). Juego y desarrollo de funciones ejecutivas en adultos. Psicopedagogía Latinoamericana, 15(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.32456/psicolat.2020.151.004
Lozano, A. (2021). Neuroeducación y juego: Estrategias para el aula del siglo XXI. Magister.
Minedu. (2016). Currículo Nacional de la Educación Básica. Ministerio de Educación del Perú. http://www.minedu.gob.pe
Minedu. (2020). Lineamientos de Educación Básica Alternativa. Ministerio de Educación del Perú.
Minedu. (2021). Sistematización de buenas prácticas educativas. Dirección de Innovación Tecnológica en Educación.
Miyake, A., et al. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49– 100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Mora, F. (2017). Neuroeducación: Solo se puede aprender aquello que se ama. Alianza Editorial. OCDE. (2020). The future of education and skills:
OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
Perkins, D. (1995). La escuela inteligente. Gedisa.
Piaget, J. (1976). La formación del símbolo en el niño. Morata.
Posner, M., & Rothbart, M. (2007). Educating the human brain. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11519-000
Rojas, P. (2019). Impacto de las metodologías activas en la permanencia escolar en EBA. Educación, 28(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.201902.005
Sardone, N., & Devlin-Scherer, R. (2016). Let the games begin: Engaging students with digital games. TechTrends, 60(5), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0085-3
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). The scientifically substantiated art of teaching: A study in the development of standards in the new academic field of neuroeducation. Teachers College Press.
UNESCO. (2018). Guía para la sistematización de experiencias educativas.
UNESCO. (2022). Reimaginar juntos nuestros futuros: Un nuevo contrato social para la educación.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and beyond. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
