Corporate Social Responsibility and Community Perception in High-Andean Areas of the Junín Region

Authors

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, community perception, social license to operate, high-Andean communities, sustainable mining, PLS-SEM

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility has become a strategic mechanism for strengthening relationships between organizations and the communities located within their areas of influence. In this context, the present study aimed to determine the influence of perceived corporate social responsibility on favorable community perception among residents of high-Andean communities in the Junín region of Peru. The research adopted a quantitative approach, with an applied, explanatory, and cross-sectional non-experimental design. The sample consisted of 112 community members selected through non-probability convenience sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale and analyzed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 4. The findings revealed that perceived corporate social responsibility positively and significantly influences favorable community perception (β = 0.833; p < 0.001), explaining 69.9% of its variance (R² = 0.699). Among the dimensions examined, environmental responsibility exerted the strongest influence, followed by philanthropic responsibility, health and safety responsibility, economic responsibility, and legal responsibility, whereas ethical responsibility did not show a statistically significant effect. These results indicate that high-Andean communities primarily value corporate actions related to environmental protection, social well-being, collective health, and local economic development. Consequently, corporate social responsibility emerges as a key factor for strengthening organizational legitimacy and social acceptance in extractive industry contexts.

References

Barchiesi, M. A., & Fronzetti, A. (2021). Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom? https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01644

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Dauda, S. (2022). Earning a social licence to operate (SLO): A conflicted minefield for mining in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 12, 101141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101141

Defensoría del Pueblo. (2024). Reporte de conflictos sociales N.° 247. Defensoría del Pueblo del Perú. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/3.pdf

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S., & Phillips, R. A. (2020). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1231–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3a ed.). Sage Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Herrera, J. (2024). La licencia social para operar en proyectos mineros: Fundamentos, desafíos y tendencias. https://oa.upm.es/84122/

Ho, S. S. H., Jia, N., & Lu, F. (2024). Can corporate social responsibility lead to social license? Journal of Management Studies, 61(2), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12863

ISO. (2010). ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html

Mansilla-Obando, K., Araya-Castillo, L., & Campos-Troncoso, R. (2022). Cuando la comunidad es invisible: Responsabilidad social empresarial en la industria minera. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(99), 1037–1053.

Minadakis, P., & Vega-Araujo, J. (2024). Rethinking the social license to operate? A theoretical exploration of its synergies with social acceptance and energy justice for a just transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 111, 103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103552

Muhammad, S., Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2024). Corporate social responsibility programs in mining areas: Community perceptions towards mining companies. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2357675. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357675

OECD. (2023). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises on responsible business conduct. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en

Ofori, J. J. Y., Ofori, D. F., & Ofori, I. K. (2019). Earning a social license to operate: Perspectives of mining communities in Ghana. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(3), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.11.005

Posleman, C. S., & Sallan, J. M. (2019). Social license to operate in the mining industry: The case of Peru. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37(6), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1585142

Sáenz, C. (2018). The context in mining projects influences the corporate social responsibility strategy to earn a social licence to operate: A case study in Peru. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1478

Sáenz, C. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and the social licence to operate within the mining industry: A Peruvian case study. Resources Policy, 74, 102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102399

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

Issue

Section

Original article